| Taxation with Misrepresentation | |
|
This page contains the correspondence of Jean-Paul Tertocha with his Senators and Representative, and their replies. |
|
| Letter to: Mark Kirk, Aaron Shock, Richard Durbin | |
| Sent:
4/8/2011 |
First off, I want you to be informed who this constituent is. I am the son of a WWII Veteran. My Father was drafted, and sent to Europe and missed his High School graduation ceremony. His Mother accepted his diploma for him. My Mother, who met my father during the war, immigrated to the United States. She did so to escape the Fascism and other negative aspects of Europe at the time. She WANTED her children to be Americans. I am a staunch patriot, and learned that from BOTH parents. I am proud of this, and will not budge on my stance! Following are some issues that involve the United States of America, that as a Citizen, I find intolerable. 1. Gasoline prices! As I see the price rise on a DAILY basis I wonder how stupid, and/or gutless the average American politician is. Over forty years ago, I was taught in business and economic class' that a person should diversify their portfolio. In other words, don't put all your eggs in one basket. I learned this throughout high school. I learned this in college as well in business class'. So what have our idiot politicians and presidents done the last forty years? Allow the country to become dependent on one energy source, petroleum. And then to add insult to injury, allow one organization, OPEC, to manipulate the supplies of oil in an unrealistic manner. Plus, OPEC is dominated by individuals that hate the Western culture. Don't believe me? Here is what Osama Bin Laden said a few years ago; " We are continuing this policy in bleeding America to the point of bankruptcy. Allah willing, and nothing is too great for Allah". And thanks to the gutless, weasel, traitors at the Federal level in our country, this is happening. Oil prices have NOTHING to do with supply and demand. Oil prices are a political statement made my America's enemies! 2. Homosexual rights. I am flat out sick of having this krap shoved down my throat. I was taught to believe homosexuality is a perversion. It is a deviation of the norm in the human standard. Those people are not a part of a minority, they are deviations from the norm. Scientifically speaking you will find that homosexuals have a malfunction of the brain. Something to do with an imbalance of key enzymes. The Bible states that homosexuality is an abomination in the eyes of the Lord. FACTS! I refuse to accept this as normal because some bleeding heart homosexual politicians want to be accepted as they are. Homosexuals are not only perverts, they are pure hedonists. All they do is seek out personal delight at the expense of society. Rarely does a homosexual do something on a purely altruistic basis. So I am telling you I WILL NOT accept homosexuals as normal members of society. WILL NOT!! 3. There are serious problems with the military. First off, our troops over-seas, are not there to promote Democracy. They are promoting imperialism! America's troops are assisting foreign governments that are unpopular with the people that live in the area. The fact is, the borders of countries in the Middle East DO NOT accurately define the cultures of people that actually live there. That is a FACT! Secondly, the military of the United State of America is being filled with skinheads, militant minorities, and homosexuals. This has gotten so bad, that REAL military individuals, those who truly love their country and the military, are not re-upping nor are quality individuals signing up. I know of individuals in the Army that are not re-upping because they are disgusted with the direction the military is taking. So Americans, thanks to inept and unethical politicians, the military will be filled with groups of people that hate each other, and are in the military to learn how to destroy things to promote their cause. FACT! 4. The Federal system in this country is bloated and has gotten to a non-productive stage. George Washington and crew set the USA up as a group of semi-autonomous states bound together by a Federal constitution. The Federal government's job is to provide a national postal system, a national military to protect the federation, and of course to provide a working currency that may be used in all states. Well, over the years politicians have bastardized this beautiful and simple plan. The Department of Energy must be eliminated. It was started to keep the USA energy independent, and has failed miserably. The DOE now is just an organization to keep politicians friends and relatives employed. The same goes for the Department of Education. Education is a state issue, not a federal one. The federal government has no business telling any state how to run it's schools. So this bloated, federal agency must be eliminated. 4. I feel I am being taxed without representation. I feel I am being taxed by the federal government in the USA and my needs and opinions are being ignored. On top of that, the tax codes are ridiculously complicated. I personally believe they are made to be complicated on purpose in order to discourage the average citizen to do their own taxes. A way to remove the average citizen from their own government. The federal income tax is WAY out of line. A solution would be a flat tax of no more than 15%. I am sick and tired of bearing the burden of politician's economic follies. As a form of protest, this is the last year I am paying federal income tax. Until I see politicians begin to represent me and my needs, and people like me, I will not pay income tax. I have studied this and find the Constitution of the United States of America guarantees me certain rights that people on the federal level are attempting to remove. I will be dammed if I will pay these politicians to remove my constitutional rights. I also intend to publish a web site promoting this cause. If you all think one person cannot promote changes, then you have not studied history very well. You need to understand this is a form of protest, and it grieves me to have to do this. I love my country and I love my state. I have no quandary paying income taxes, as long as they are used for America and her people, but this is not the case. I cannot set idly by as elected officials continue to destroy the USA from inside. I refuse to finance this! I refuse to be a part of this! I demand that you send this message to the president, and all of your associates! That is your job! |
| Mark Kirk's Reply | |
| Delivery has failed to these recipients or distribution lists: senator@kirk.senate.gov The recipient's mailbox is full and can't accept messages now. Microsoft Exchange will not try to redeliver this message for you. Please try resending this message later, or contact the recipient directly. Sent by Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 |
|
| Aaron Shock's Reply | |
| Received
4/23/2011 |
Dear
Mr. Tertocha, Thank
you for contacting me with your thoughts in regard to the direction of
our country and issues that Congress needs to address. I appreciate the
benefit of your views and welcome the opportunity to respond. l
believe that the most serious problem facing our country is the
financial crisis. Projections for the national debt are at $ 15 trillion
in 201 1, or 98% of GDP. Additionally, between 1999 and 2008 the annual
average increase in domestic non-defense and non-discretionary spending
(things such as education, food stamps, and excluding
Medicaid/Medicare/social Security) was 6.4%. However, in 2009, this rose
by 11.2%, and in 2010, it has grown by an additional 14.7%. This
type of spending is simply unsustainable, especially when compared to a
4.2% reduction in household income since 2008. Our
financial problems are far beyond what our country has ever faced. To
put this in perspective, the average budget deficit (or shortfall) under
President Bush was approximately $200 billion, with the largest deficit
equaling $468 billion. By contrast, under President Obama deficits for
his first two years in office have been at $1.5 trillion each year. In
addition, the President's proposed 2012 budget, by his own projection,
is scored with a deficit of $ 1.6 trillion. Even
with overspending by previous Congresses and the Bush Administration,
our nation could have grown out of our debt in a generation, but no
more. As a member of the House Ways and Means Committee, l know that we
must do better and write a budget that does not add more crushing debt
to our already overburdened fiscal situation. The
House passed H.R. 1, the Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, also
known as the Continuing Resolution, in February. This legislation would
fund the Federal Government for the remaining months of the fiscal year,
and cuts $100 billion from discretionary spending. Everything
was on the table for cuts, both Republican and Democrat priorities, and
virtually no program, including defense spending, was spared. Unfortunately,
some of my Senate colleagues have chosen to offer criticism rather than
a viable alternative to the House's spending bill. As the budget debate
continues, 1 look forward to suggestions from my colleagues in the
Senate as well as the House. 1 do not believe that it is enough to
highlight the spending problem, only to turn around and ask that those
cuts not affect Illinois. The hard truth is that everyone must do their
part. It should also be noted that the same Senators and Representatives
who are criticizing these cuts are responsible for failing to pass a
full-year budget last year for the first time since 1974. The
current levels of government spending also have far-reaching
consequences for the economy and job creation. While it may seem that
these two issues are completely unrelated, the truth is that they are
very much connected. The President's own economic advisors have
estimated that debt loads above 90 percent of GDP result in a reduction
in economic growth of one percentage point. Conversely, a one percent
increase in GDP could create 979,000 jobs. Put more simply, our current
debt level is creating a drag on our economy that could be removed just
by reducing our level of spending. Far from destroying jobs, cutting
government spending will create thousands of new jobs. The best way to
help struggling Americans is to help create an economy that is growing
and that will provide them with job opportunities so they can support
themselves and their families. Ultimately, that is what a vote to cut
spending is about. I
have come to accept that we can no longer afford certain spending items
1 would have supported only a few years ago. Some items simply are not
at the top priority level and thus can no longer be funded. Other worthy
programs must be trimmed back significantly if we are going I to return
to fiscal sanity and restore economic growth with robust job creation in
the private sector. Every program we can do without-.-, or that can be
done in the private sector-.- must l have its federal funding
eliminated. I ! I
While it is important to make significant cuts to government
discretionary spending, that is only |1 a down-payment on reducing the
deficit. In 2010, Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, ' k' datary
spending'' because the government is obligated to pay these benefits,
make known as man up 60% of federal spending, vastly more than any other
spending segment. By 2016, spending on those three programs alone will
equal the amount of federal spending on all programs in 2010 and amount
to 72% of spending. By 2045, the amount the federal government is
obligated to pay in mandatory spending will equal the entire revenue of
the federal budget. In other words, the federal government will
literally have no funds left over to fund anything else, including
education, defense, and transportation. We need entitlement reform if we
are going to get a handle on the financial crisis facing our country. What
is more, if we keep borrowing to cover huge annual deficits, the
interest on our accumulated national debt will equal every dollar of
annual revenue with no money left for Social Security, Medicare, and
Medicaid payments, let alone discretionary spending-even for national
defense. l
believe the American people have been lied to in the past about the dire
financial condition our country faces. Catastrophic crises are looming
if we fail to take dramatic action to get back on track to living within
our means and growing our economy. 1 will not be part of deceiving the
people 1 serve by voting for funding that is popular with various
segments of people, even if we cannot afford it. It is long past time
our government representatives stand up and do the right thing, even
though the opposite is the politically popular position. We cannot
continue on an unsustainable financial path until we hit a brick wall or
fall off a steep cliff as a few American cities and foreign nations have
done. In
addition to cutting federal spending through the budget, 1 have also
introduced H.R. 606, the Federal Sunset Commission. H.R. 606 is a
hi-partisan bill that calls for the creation of a Commission that would
review all federal programs and abolish those for which no public need
exists. Streamlining federal programs by eliminating those that are
unnecessary or redundant will save taxpayer money, as well as make
remaining federal programs more efficient. H.R. 606 has been referred to
the House Commit-tee on Oversight and Government Reform, and it is my
hope that it will be brought to the House floor for a vote in the near
future. l
have also no-sponsored H.R. 10, the Regulations from the Executive In
Need of Scrutiny (REINS) Act. This legislation requires all major
regulations from executive agencies to be submitted to Congress for
approval before becoming law. The REINS Act will increase transparency
in the regulation process, and keep burdensome and unnecessary
regulations from being enacted with no input from the American people. 1
believe that executive agencies should be held accountable for how they
spend the taxpayers' money, just as Congress is, and this legislation
will do just that. Ultimately',
we are at a crossroads. lf we do not make difficult decisions now and
get government spending under control, the problem will only grow, and
eventually we will reach a crisis point. l recognize that there are no
easy solutions for the challenges facing our country, but 1 am willing
to make difficult decisions to save future generations from a crushing
burden of debt. We have the advantage right now to look into the future;
we know the consequences if we do nothing. We must ad now to avoid the
fate of those who failed before us. Again,
thank you for contacting me. Please don't hesitate to contact me in the
future with regard to this or any other issue. Also, to stay informed on
what's happening in Washington, feel free to sign up for my online
newsletter, The Schock Report, at www.schoek.house.gov. Respectfully, Aaron
Schock Member
of Congress AJS/KR
|
| Richard Durbin's Reply | |
| Received
4/14/2011
|
Dear Mr.
Tertocha:
Thank you for contacting me about increasing domestic energy production. I appreciate hearing from you. I share your interest in addressing our nation's energy needs and support safe and environmentally responsible oil production. I also recognize that an energy policy based primarily on drilling will not meet the needs of American consumers. The recent rise in fuel prices and increased energy demands have sparked an increased interest in opening additional, more challenging, areas in the outer continental shelf (OCS) and Arctic Wildlife National Refuge (ANWR) to oil and gas leasing. The Deepwater Horizon oil spill has shown us the dangers of deepwater drilling and the prospect of drilling in ANWR poses threats to critical habitats and a number of species. American dependence on foreign oil companies on the other hand, puts us at the mercy of dictators in politically tumultuous regions. The risks of our nation's dependence on fossil fuels are very real. More areas of our onshore and offshore oil and gas reserves have been made available for leasing and development than ever before - last year, America produced more oil than we had in the last seven years. Despite this, gas prices are nearing a two-year high and continue to rise. While the oil industry has reaped billions of dollars in profits - even after losses stemming from the Deepwater Horizon spill in April 2010 - consumers face a challenging economy. To gain real energy independence and break our addiction to foreign oil, we need to continue to invest in energy innovation and research. President Obama's budget proposal for Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 includes provisions that are designed to guarantee that the public receives a fair return on the development of our natural resources on public lands and reins in the big oil companies, while ensuring that our approach includes safe and environmentally responsible oil and natural gas production. While the Interior Department considers the 2012-2017 OCS leasing plan for areas in Alaska, the Atlantic, and portions of the Gulf of Mexico, I have called on the President to access our strategic petroleum reserve to at least temporarily stabilize current gasoline prices. Additionally, the President's recent "Blueprint for a Secure Energy Future" outlines significant steps we can take to increase responsible domestic oil and gas development in the short term, while also harnessing new technologies for sustainable energy development. These efforts include reducing oil demand and making our means of transportation more efficient, manufacturing clean and renewable energy technologies such as wind and biomass, and, in accordance with need and changes in technology over time, reforming appropriate safety and environmental standards. The spending bill proposed in the House of Representatives (H.R. 1) would take the opposite approach, cutting $750 million from the Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. This represents a 35 percent cut from last year's funding level. In addition, H.R. 1 freezes funding for important research projects that are making new technologies commercially feasible. Innovative energy research projects, including those at Argonne National Laboratory in Illinois, would be stalled or permanently cancelled as a result of these drastic funding cuts. I am eager to explore ways to rein in our growing national debt. Such decisions, however, must be reasoned and carefully considered. I will keep your thoughts in mind as we work toward federal policies that encourage energy efficiency and the development of clean, cost-efficient, domestic energy sources. Thank you again for contacting me. Please feel free to keep in touch. Sincerely, Richard J. Durbin United States Senator RJD/ei |
| Letter to: Mark Kirk,
Aaron Shock, Richard Durbin sent:
5/17/2011 |
OBAMA wants us to cut the amount of gasoline we use. The best way to stop using so much gasoline is to deport 15 million illegal immigrants! That would be 15 million less people using our gas. The price of gas would come down. Bring our troops home from Afghanistan to guard the borders. When they catch an illegal immigrant crossing the Border, hand him/her a canteen, rifle and some ammo and ship him/her to Afghanistan . Tell him/her if they wants to come to AMERICA then he must serve a tour in OUR military. Give him/her a soldier's pay while he's there and tax him on it. After his tour, they will be allowed to become a citizen since their defended this country. They will also be registered to be taxed and be a legal resident. This option will probably deter illegal immigration and provide a solution for the troops in Afghanistan and the aliens trying to make a better life for themselves. If they refuse to serve, ship them to Afghanistan anyway, without the canteen, rifle or ammo. Problem solved!! |
| Aaron
Shock Answer
Received 5/23/2011 |
Dear
Mr. Tertocha, Thank-you
for contacting me with regard to immigration. I appreciate having the
benefit of your views and the opportunity to respond. Our
country is truly a nation of immigrants Whether it was the pilgrims coming
to the new world for religious freedom, or Europeans crossing the Atlantic
and arriving at Ellis Island to start a new life- immigrants have always
been the foundation of America. Virtually every family living in our
country originally came from somewhere else. People might consider their
heritage as Italian, Polish, African, or Irish, but they are all equally
American. However,
today our country faces a great challenge with regard to immigration.
There are some foreigners that choose not to follow the legal pathway and
procedures set forth to enter our country. While their intentions might be
noble: to work hard and earn a decent living for their family, there is no
excuse for their illegal entry into the United States. That is why our
border security needs to be strengthened. This is necessary not only for
immigration purposes, but also for national security reasons. Our
nation needs to know-and has every right to know-who is coming into our
country. Just as locking the door to your home when you leave does not
make you a bad neighbor, regulating our border does not make the USA a bad
neighbor. After all, the government of Mexico does not have an open border
with their southern neighbor, Guatemala. In
addition, the current system for processing potential immigrants into our
country needs to be strengthened and streamlined. The more effective our
U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Citizenship and Immigration
Services are, the more likely foreigners will immigrate to our country in
a legal manner. In
the 2010 DHS Appropriations Bill, H.R. 2892, money was allocated to border
security. While the bill was not perfect, I strongly supported it because
of what it did to enhance border security. More
than $ 10 billion went to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
This included $800 million for border fencing, infrastructure, and
technology. Additionally, over $500 million was directed for air and
marine border protection. The
DHS Appropriations Bill also provided more than $5 billion for Immigration
and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Ninety million dollars was directed for ICE
technology and modernization. Furthermore
$1.5 billion was allocated specifically for efforts to identify and deport
illegal immigrants with criminal records. Funding in the bill also
provides for investigations, legal proceedings, intelligence, visa
security programs, and detention, custody and removal operations. Ninety-one
amendments were offered to the DHS Appropriations Bill. However, the
Democratic Majority, led by Speaker Nancy Pelosi, only allowed for an
actual vote on 14 of them. Nevertheless,
I voted in favor of an amendment offered by Rep. Jerry Lewis (R-CA) to add
$34 million to U.S. Customs and Border Protections to fund 200 additional
Border Patrol agents. I also voted for an amendment offered by Rep. Steve
King (R-IA) that prohibits funds in the bill being used to employ illegal
workers, as defined in the Immigration and Nationality Ad. Thankfully,
both of these amendments passed, and were included in the final version of
the bill. I
also want to be clear that the Department of Homeland Security and its
efforts to protect our border are not without their own issues of waste
and duplication, and I support eliminating duplicating or ineffective
measures if they will help cut our spending and reduce our debt. A recent
example of such wasteful spending is the virtual fence'' project. The
virtual fence'' was begun under a contract signed in 2005, and was
supposed to make the U.S.-Mexican border more secure using an advanced
network of cameras, radar, and unmanned drones. The fence was projected to
cost $7 billion to cover the entire 2,000 mile border, but after only
covering 53 miles, the Department of Homeland Security had already spent
$1 billion. For that reason, I support the decision by DHS to cancel the
project and focus on more efficient use of existing enforcement measures. You
may also be interested to know that in July of 2010, I supported H.R.
5875, the Emergency Border Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010.
This legislation would have provided additional emergency funding to DHS
and Customs and Border Protection to be used for additional border patrol,
including $208 million to hire additional border patrol agents to be
deployed on the Southwest border and $14 million for security fencing,
infrastructure and technology. As
you know, these are very troubling times for our economy. Unemployment is
at the highest rate in decades. It is not acceptable for folks who are in
our country illegally to take jobs away from American citizens. That is
why I support E-verify, a DHS system that allows employers to
electronically verify the legal status of employees. Under the program,
participating employers submit information about their new employees to
DHS. This information is automatically compared with Social Security
Administration information, and DHS databases if necessary, to verify
identity and employment eligibility. Currently, over 100,000 employers are
registered for the reverify program. More than 3.2 million new hires have
already been processed through EVerify, and the system is currently
capable of handling up to 25 million inquiries per year. While
I support the E-verify system, I do not support making it mandatory for
businesses to use the system. Many small businesses simply cannot afford
to pay the set-up, training, and annual fee for use of the current system
until improvements are made to drive down its costs. In the meantime I
believe the federal government should encourage the use of E-verify. I am
a strong proponent of making English the official language of the United
States. We should encourage immigrants to learn English, the common
language of our nation, so they can communicate and fully participate in
American society. For this reason, I added my name as a no-sponsor of H.R.
997, the National Language Unity Act. This bill requires that all official
functions of the federal government be conducted in English. Additionally,
the legislation requires that DHS create a uniform English test for
candidates for naturalization. In
the 1 112th Congress, I will be first in line to work with the new House
leadership and my colleagues in a hi-partisan manner to address the
challenges ahead. Make no mistake: I'm committed to immigration reform.
The current status-quo of ignoring the problem might seem politically
expedient for some Members of Congress, but in the long term it is simply
unacceptable to the American people. Again,
thank you for contacting me. As the debate in Washington about immigration
continues, I will be certain to keep your views in mind. Please do not
hesitate to contact me in the future regarding this, or any other issue.
Also, to stay informed on what is happening in Washington please feel free
to sign up for my electronic newsletter, The Schock Report, at
www.schock.house.gov. Respectfully,
Aaron
Schock Member
of Congress AJS/KR |
| Mark Kirk Answer
Received 7/9/2011 |
Dear
Mr. Tertocha: Thank
you for contacting me regarding the price of gasoline. I appreciate
hearing your thoughts on this important issue. Our
dependence on foreign oil is a threat to our national security and our
economy. Our country produces Only 5.4 million barrels Of oil daily and
must import another 1 1.7 million barrels to meet our needs. We need an
energy independence policy based on all of the above'' sources, including
domestic drilling, natural gas, nuclear, wind, solar, hydro, clean coal,
fuel cells, advanced batteries
and conservation. A
long-term energy strategy to provide stability in the market place and
reduce our oil consumption should include responsible domestic oil and gas
exploration. We should accelerate permitting in the Gulf of Mexico to
boost domestic production and spur new job growth. Congress should also
explore more opportunities for natural gas production within our own
borders. The United States has more than 272 billion cubic feet of dry
natural gas reserves both inland and offshore, but consumes less than 22
million cubic feet per year. This untapped resource may also be a viable
solution to help end our dependency on imported petroleum. With
the summer months upon us and gas prices spiking at the pump, a discussion
has been raised bout using up the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR).
In the wake of the 1973-74 oil embargo, a the United States established
the SPR to protect the country from upsets in petroleum supplies, and to
guard itself against national security threats. Strategically located
along the Gulf Coast to ensure quick distribution from refineries, the SPR
holds approximately 727 million barrels of emergency crude oil and is the
largest stockpile of its kind. Delving into our nation' s strategic fuel
reserves to prevent small price fluctuations is a poor, short-term
solution to a greater, more systemic problem. The
SPR should be held in reserve to ensure our military has what it needs in
an emergency, no matter what. Strategic oil reserves should only be used
in times of national emergencies, not for price control. Congress
should wipe out the complicated rules that have divided the nation' s
gasoline market into 15 separate monopolies, called boutique fuels.''
Currently, there are 15 types of uniquely blended fuel sold in different
areas across the country. These special blends known as boutique fuels''
are not interchangeable with other fuel blends. For instance, while we can
buy regular gasoline in Central Illinois, only reformulated gasoline (RFG)
blended with ethanol is available in Chicagoland. This gasoline is unique
to this area and may not be sold elsewhere under federal regulation. If
the fuel supply of a unique blend is disrupted or a pipeline fails, law
prohibits our local refineries from using a different blend to make up for
supply loss. On
March 8, 2011 Senator
Roy Blunt (R-MO) introduced the Gas Accessibility and Stabilization (GAS)
Act to address regulation constraints of boutique fuels. I am proud to
cosponsor this legislation. The GAS act simplifies gasoline regulations so
that local refineries can respond to gas disruptions before prices spike
at the pump. The GAS Act is but one of many legislative approaches I will
support as a Senator, and have supported throughout my tenure as a
representative in the House. As a
Congressman, I worked hard to promote strategies that would increase our
energy independence. I authored the Apollo Energy Independence Act, H.R.
6385, which would tap the greatest assets of the United States - Yankee
ingenuity and free markets - to boost alternative vehicles and clean
American energy sources to reduce our consumption of foreign oil by nearly
85 percent. H.R. 6385 would have provided market incentives to reduce our
dependence on oil from the Middle East without raising our taxes. In
addition, the Apollo Energy Independence Act would have permanently
extended investment tax credits for renewable energy sources such as wind,
solar, fuel cell, nuclear energy and hydropower. This bill was a right
step and a model for moving our nation on a path to a more comprehensive
and inclusive energy strategy. In
December of 2007, Congress chose wisely to increase our nation's Corporate
Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards. I voted to pass the House-amended
version of H.R. 6, the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007. For
the first time in thirty years, this landmark energy legislation increased
the CAFE standard for cars and SUVS from 27.5 mites per gallon (MPG) and
22.2 mpg respectively, to 35 MPG by 2020. This provision will save 1.1
million barrels of oil per day and 191 million metric tons of greenhouse
gases per year. This bill became Public Law No: 110-140
and I am proud to have voted in favor of this legislation. These initiatives are components of overdue energy reforms our country needs to lessen its dependency on foreign oil, bolster our national security and promote job growth. With a comprehensive approach we can assert our energy independence and lessen the burden on taxpayers at the pump. Again,
thank you for taking the time to contact me. To stay informed on important
issues, I encourage you to visit my website at http://kirk.senate.gov and
my Facebook page at http://www.facebook.co|senatorKkk. Very
Truly Yours, Mark
Kirk United
States Senator |
Please note: Posting of Mark Kirks letter was delayed due to a computer failure that I use to maintain this website.
| ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ | NOTE!
Richard Durbin chose not to reply to this letter!
Apparently he supports Taxation without representation. Send him your tax dollars but forget about sending him your opinions. Unless they match party dogma, he is not interested in what you think! |